• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

CINA.

  • About
    • Mission
    • People
  • Research
    • Research
    • Projects
    • RFPs
  • Education
    • Resources
    • Internships
  • Publications
    • Newsletter Archive
    • Director’s Blog
  • News & Events
    • News
    • CINA Director’s Blog
    • Digital Archive
    • Events
    • Work with Us
  • Contact
  • Search Toggle
  • Skip to content

A Field‑Wide Systematic Review and Meta‑analysis of Putative Risk and Protective Factors for Radicalization Outcomes

Dec 2019

  • Journal Article

Journal of Quantitative Criminology
This systematic review sought to collate and synthesize the risk and protective factors for different outcomes of radicalization. We aimed to firstly quantify the effects of all factors for which rigorous empirical data exists, and secondly, to differentiate between factors related to radical attitudes, intention, and behaviors. The goal was to develop a rank-order of factors based on their pooled estimates in order to gain a better understanding of which factors may be most important, and the differential effects on the different outcomes. Random effects meta-analysis pooled primarily bivariate effect sizes to calculate pooled estimates for each factor. Meta-regression was used to examine the effects of a range of study-level characteristics, including the effects of using partial effects sizes as supplementary effect sizes where bivariate estimates were unavailable. Subgroup analysis was used to further analyze the extent to which the combining of effect sizes from different sources contributed to heterogeneity and estimate inflation. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was used to identify cases where a single study was a significant source of heterogeneity. Extensive searches in English, German and Dutch resulted in the screening of more than 10,000 items, and a final inclusion of 57 publications published between 2007 and 2018 from which 62 individual level factors were identified across three radicalization outcomes: attitudes, intentions, and actions. Effect sizes ranged from z − 0.621 to 0.572. The smallest estimates were found for sociodemographic factors, while the largest effect sizes were found for traditional criminogenic and criminotrophic factors such as low self-control, thrill-seeking, and attitudinal factors, with radical attitudes having the largest effect on radical intentions and behaviors. The most commonly researched factors, sociodemographic factors, have exceptionally small effects, even when effect sizes are derived from bivariate relationships. The finding regarding the effects of radical attitudes on intentions and actions provide empirical support for existing theoretical frameworks. The consistency among the clustering of familiar criminogenic factors within the rank-order could have implications for the development of a more evidence based approach to risk assessment and counter violent extremism policies.

Authors

  • David Weisburd
  • Badi Hasisi
  • Yael Litmanovitz
  • Michael Wolfowicz
Publication Download

Topics:

  • Geospatial
  • Networks

Research Areas:

  • Criminal network analysis
  • Dynamic patterns of criminal activity
  • Network analytics
  • Spatiotemporal patterns

*The programs and services offered by George Mason University are open to all who seek them. George Mason does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, ethnic national origin (including shared ancestry and/or ethnic characteristics), sex, disability, military status (including veteran status), sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age, marital status, pregnancy status, genetic information, or any other characteristic protected by law. After an initial review of its policies and practices, the university affirms its commitment to meet all federal mandates as articulated in federal law, as well as recent executive orders and federal agency directives.

CINA Now

Events

All Events

Publications

The Key to Deobfuscation is Pattern of Life, not Overcoming Encryption

Published: Oct 4, 2025

The Organized Activities of Ransomware Groups: A Social network Approach

Published: Mar 14, 2025
All Publications

News

CINA Distinguished Speaker Series with Colton Seale: Interviewer Mindset

CINA  |   April 3, 2025  |   Posted In:
  • Digital Archive
  • Uncategorized

CINA  |   March 6, 2025  |   Posted In:
  • Uncategorized
All News

Science and Technology Directorate’s Office of University Programs
CINA at George Mason University Logo
Copyright © 2025 All Rights Reserved | CINA Is A Department of Homeland Security Center of Excellence led by George Mason University
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
  • YouTube